Moffat & Co.

Joseph L. Ulvr

Jerome P. Bastien

Scott Tremblay

Adele J. Finlayson

Ashley Chu

Gary Arkin

Amy Thomas

Susan Beaubien

John Kevin Carton

Adam Tracey

Janice G. Kelland

Eduardo Fonseca

Barry E. Hutsel

Andy K. Jarzyna

Jaimie M. Bordman

Sandra M. Ward

James R. Palmer

Howard P. Knopf

November 12, 2018 | Recent Developments

Follow Up on Bill C-86 – The Omnibus Bill that Amends Canadian IP Law. Bill C-86 has already been given second reading and is at the Finance Committee of the House of Commons. Yesterday, November 7, 2018, in the Finance Committee, there were about 10 minutes in total testimony by Grant Lynds, past President of […]

November 12, 2018 | Recent Developments

Massive Canadian IP Law Reform in a Budget Bill – Throwing Parliamentary Scrutiny Under the Omnibus Bus with Bill C-86.   Bill C-86, which was given first reading on October 29, 2018, is 884 pages long. It is an omnibus budget implementation bill that touches innumerable unrelated issues and amends dozens of acts … Continue reading […]

September 17, 2018 | Recent Developments

On September 14, 2018 the Supreme Court of Canada held that An ISP can recover its costs of compliance with a Norwich order, but it is not entitled to be compensated for every cost that it incurs in complying with such an order. Recoverable costs must be reasonable and must arise from compliance with the […]

September 17, 2018 | Recent Developments

Two New Copyright Board Appointments: Nathalie Théberge and Adriane Porcin. Read BLOG POST from Howard Knopf on these appointments.

September 17, 2018 | Recent Developments

More from Howard Knopf On Mass Copyright Litigation in Canada – Part II. Read BLOG POST from Howard Knopf.

September 17, 2018 | Recent Developments

American NAFTA Inconsistency Re Copyright Term Extension – And Why This Issue Matters Bigly & Involves Billions. Read BLOG POST from Howard Knopf on this issue.

September 17, 2018 | Recent Developments

More from Howard Knopf On Mass Copyright Litigation in Canada – Part I. Read BLOG POST from Howard Knopf.

September 17, 2018 | Recent Developments

Will the Canadian Voltage Reverse Class Action Now Fizzle? Read BLOG POST from Howard Knopf.

August 29, 2018 | Recent Developments

James Palmer has prepared a discussion paper on how upcoming changes to the Trademarks Act may impact dealings with the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO), titled A Modernized Trademark Regime for Canada. The following is brief excerpt from the introduction: In 1954 Canada brought into force the current Trademarks Act that broke with many of Canada’s longstanding traditions […]

August 6, 2018 | Recent Developments

EXCESS COPYRIGHT: Some Notes from Howard Knopf About Recent Developments at the Copyright Board of Canada – click Learn More  

July 22, 2018 | Recent Developments

 Macera & Jarzyna LLP Celebrates 40 Years in Business.   It was July 1978 when Andy Jarzyna and John Macera got together and opened shop in Canada’s capital city, Ottawa. Since then, Macera & Jarzyna LLP has become known internationally and at home for its excellence and specialization in Intellectual Property. Andy Jarzyna (1978)    […]

July 6, 2018 | Recent Developments

Mediatube Corp. v. Bell Canada – Federal Court of Appeal – A company called Media Tube sued Bell Canada for patent infringement with respect to technology pertaining to Bell Fibe TV. Bereskin & Parr acted for Media Tube. Media Tube lost at trial (decision dated January 4, 2017) and appealed. On its appeal, Media Tube (now represented […]

July 6, 2018 | Recent Developments

From May 28 to June 1, 2018, Howard Knopf attended the 36th World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights held in Geneva, Switzerland on behalf of the Civil Society Coalition.  Howard made the following submissions – one – two.

July 6, 2018 | Recent Developments

On June 19, 2018, Howard Knopf and Joe Ulvr attended Canada in International Law: At the Inflection Point, sponsored by The Centre for International Governance Innovation.  The conference explored the challenges Canada faces in contributing to shaping global rule of law.  The conference coincided with the launch of CIGI’s latest publication Reflections on Canada’s Past, […]

July 2, 2018 | Recent Developments

On June 28, 2018, Susan Beaubien was elected to the Board of Directors of the Canadian chapter of the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ). ICJ is an international NGO headquartered in Geneva whose mission is promotion of the rule of law, human rights and the independence of the legal profession. The Canadian chapter of the […]

May 14, 2018 | Recent Developments

On May 5, 2018, Howard Knopf gave a talk titled “Copyright: Upcoming Changes and What You Need to Know”, at the Artists’ Legal Services Ottawa (ALSO) Arts Law Conference held at Arts Court.  Howard focused on the Government’s review of the Copyright Act and the Copyright Board – What’s at Stake.  Howard’s blog post is […]

March 20, 2018 | Recent Developments

Howard Knopf’s recent paper titled “Canada’s Role in the Relationship of Trade and Intellectual Property” has been published as Paper #17 in the series “Canada in International Law at 150 and Beyond” by the Centre for International Governance Innovation (“CIGIO”).  You can view the paper by clicking Learn More.

March 15, 2018 | Recent Developments

Diagnostic methods cause controversy at CIPO – Read Jerome Bastien’s blog post on the recently published policy of the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) on patent applications for medical diagnostic methods, which has been the subject of criticism.  The English translation is available at this LINK.

March 15, 2018 | Recent Developments

Legally Speaking with Jerome Bastien – On March 1, 2018, Jerome Bastien appeared on the podcast “Legally Speaking with Lawyer Kristen O’Keef”.  Jerome discusses the importance of securing patents and trademarks to protect valuable intellectual property rights.  The podcast can be accessed at this LINK.

March 2, 2018 | Recent Developments

Susan Beaubien has been appointed by the Government of Canada to the roster of qualified individuals to determine disputes arising under Chapter 19 of the North America Free Trade Act (NAFTA) . Members of the roster may be appointed to serve on dispute settlement panels established under Chapter 19 of NAFTA. The appointment is effected by […]

February 3, 2018 | Recent Developments

Riches, McKenzie & Herbert LLP v. Cosmetic Warriors Limited, 2018 FC 63 (Justice Manson) Cosmetic Warriors Limited (“Cosmetic”) owes a trademark registration (TMA649810) for the word LUSH, for use in association with “Clothing, namely, t-shirts”.   On September 10, 2014, at the request of Riches, McKenzie & Herbert LLP, the Registrar of Trade-marks issued a Notice […]

December 14, 2017 | Recent Developments

Teva Canada Limited v Pfizer Canada Inc., 2017 FC 957 (Zinn J).   Teva and Pfizer have been in litigation regarding Pfizer’s 1998 patent on its Viagra (sildenafil citrate) pharmaceutical since 2007. In 2012, the Supreme Court of Canada held that the patent was invalid for inadequate disclosure. Now, Teva seeks compensation for damages it […]

September 28, 2017 | Recent Developments

In a light hearted, but forceful attempt to strengthen its brand and avoid the “generic” label, the Belgium company that owns the VELCRO trademark, Velcro BVBA, has produced a video that seeks to educate the public on how to use – and not to use – the trademarks of well-known products, including its own. The […]

July 29, 2017 | Recent Developments

Access Copyright v. York U – And All Eyes Over to York U for What’s Next The Good News and the Bad News The only good news for the Canadian educational community about the recent Federal Court decision in Access Copyright v. York University is that the judgment is, with respect, so clearly and consistently […]

July 6, 2017 | Recent Developments

In a summary trial, Dairy Queen Canada, Inc. (“DQ”) sought relief including damages for passing off, an injunction restraining M.Y. Sundae Inc. and two individual defendants (“Sundae”) from further operation of its franchise and use of the Dairy Queen name and marks, and a declaration that the Franchise Agreement (“FA”) was terminated. Sundae brought a […]

July 4, 2017 | Recent Developments

The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled on the degree of utility required of patented inventions. The decision does away with the controversial “promise doctrine” that had evolved in Canadian jurisprudence, and brings Canadian patent law back in line with other jurisdictions on the issue of utility. Canada’s Patent Act, along with the patent law […]

June 21, 2017 | Recent Developments

Diageo, a subsidiary of Diageo plc, one of the world’s largest producers of spirits, brought an action against Heaven Hill, alleging infringement of Diageo’s trademarks associated with its CAPTAIN MORGAN rum products, and passing off of Heaven Hill’s ADMIRAL NELSON’S rum products as those of Diageo. Heaven Hill, a company located in Bardstown, Kentucky, counterclaimed […]

June 16, 2017 | Recent Developments

The trademark applicant, Domaines Pinnacle Inc., was a producer of apple-based alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages and foods. The trademark opponent was a subsidiary of Constellation Brands Inc, which produced and distributed wines. The applicant applied for DOMMAINES PINNACLE & Design (depicted below). The opponent opposed the mark based on confusion with its word mark, PINNACLES. […]

June 16, 2017 | Recent Developments

The British Columbia Court of Appeal has recently affirmed a lower court finding that bidding on Google Adwords consisting of the names or trademarks of others does not, by itself, constitute passing off. However, incorporating such names or marks into a domain name can result in liability, even if the website located at the domain […]

June 16, 2017 | Recent Developments

In the context of a patent impeachment action, the Defendants, Shire LLC and Shire Pharma Canada ULC (“Shire”), brought a motion to strike portions of the Reply of the Plaintiff, Apotex Inc. Shire first sought to strike an allegation that was found by the Court to be solely a statement of legal conclusions to be […]